"At the end of the day, boys, you don't tell me how rough the water is, you bring in the ship." – Steve Stone
A Goat Riders Affiliate
Go Cubs!

Wrigley Rooftop Directory
Ryne Sandberg Fan Page
The Cubdom Photo Gallery
The Cubs Prayer
Cubs Calendar
Jim Hendry Page
Cubs Ownership History
Baseball Business Essays
TheCubdom Hall of Cubs

Recent Blog Updates

Editor's Pick:

Goat Riders of the Apocalypse
Bleed Cubbie Blue
Desipio Media Ventures
Hire Jim Essian!
Cub Reporter
Ivy Chat
Cub Town
Ghost of Paul Noce
The Cubdom
Thunder Matt's Saloon
View From the Bleachers
WGN-TV Baseball Blog

Honorable Mention:

A Hundred Next Years
A League of Her Own
Agony and Ivy
Bad News Cubs
Baseball Diamond News
Boys of Spring
Bush League Times
Chicago Cubs Baseball
Chicago Cubs Blog
Chicago Cubs Online
Church of Baseball
Clark & Addison blog
College of Idiots
Cubs f/x
Cubs Hot Stove
Cubs Hub
Cubs Obsession
Five Outs to go
Gonfalon Cubs
Kosuke Fukodome
Out of Right Field
The Cubs Brickyard
The Other Fifteen
The Ted Lilly Fan Club
Temporary Bleachers


Cubbie Nation
Holy Cow Bell
Ivy Envy
Towel Drills
Turning Two
Wasting away in Wrigleyville

Soldiering On:

Die-hard Cubs Fun
Fire Dusty Baker
Northside Lounge
Peoria Northsider Report
Yarbage Cub Review

Cubs Sites:

Desipio Boards
North Side Baseball
Inside the Ivy
The Heckler
My Wrigleyville

Just Read 'em!

Baseball Analysts
Baseball Musings
Baseball Prospectus
Baseball Think Factory
Hardball Times


Baseball Toaster
Most Valuable Network
SportsBlog Nation

NL Central

Brew Crew Ball MIL
Bucs Dugout PIT
Crawfish Boxes HOU
Get Up Baby STL
Honest Wagner PIT
Red Hot Mama CIN
Red Reporter CIN
Viva El Birdos STL

NL East

Amazin Avenue NYM
Citizens Blog PHI
Federal Baseball WAS
Fish Stripes FLA
The Good Phight PHI
Sabernomics ATL

NL West

6-4-2 LAD, LAA
AZ Snake Pit AZ
Dodger Thoughts LAD
Ducksnorts SD
Gas Lamp Ball SD
McCovey Chronicles SF
Only Baseball Matters SF
Purple Row COL

AL East

Batters Box TOR
Bronx Banter NYY
Camden Chat BAL
DRays Bay TB
Futility Infielder NYY
Joy of Sox BOS
Over the Monster BOS
Pinstripe Alley NYY
Replacement Level Yankees Weblog NYY

AL Central

Aaron's Baseball Blog MIN
Bless You Boys DET
Let's Go Tribe CLE
Royals Review KC
South Side Sox CHW
Sox Machine CHW
Tiger Blog DET
Twins Geek MIN

AL West

Athletics Nation OAK
Halo's Heaven LAA
Lone Star Ball TEX
Lookout Landing SEA
USS Mariner SEA


Beyond the Boxscore
Minor League Ball

Chicago Sports

Section 8 Fire
Windy City Gridiron Bears

News Sources

Sun-Times Cubs
Daily Herald Sports
Daily Southtown Sports

The Taxes... They are a changing...

Friday, November 5, 2004

While perusing the recently updated blogs in the "Cubs Blog Army" I came across a short entry posted at 1060 West (a new member of the army), which pointed me to Bob Verdi's article in the Sunday Tribune.

In short, the article says that professional sports owners were included in the pig roast (tons of pork!) Federal Corporate Tax cut that was passed and signed recently. Apparently, Congress has changed the tax depreciation rules for professional teams back to the way it was in the 70's when Bud Selig purchased the Brewers using a federal tax write-off.

Depreciation is spreading out the cost of something over its useful life. For example, if I buy a package of hot dogs, I don't count the whole cost of the hot dogs on my first meal, I split the cost over each meal that I eat the hot dogs... this is essentially how depreciation works.

Since most people aren't familiar with the tax depreciation rules for pro-sports teams, a quick review: In the 70's, a new owner could claim virtually the full value of their franchise as a business expense. As a result, they didn't have to pay taxes on most of their income from the team for the first few years. It used to be that those savings stretched out 15 years.

Later, Congress changed two important factors. First, the expenses could only be claimed over a 5 year span, and second, only player salaries could be deducted. This change had 2 effects. The first effect was to make it a bit more difficult to buy a team with a tax rebate, and the second effect was to encourage owners to buy a team, hold on to it for the quick tax breaks, and then sell if 5-6 years later so that another wealthy individual could take advantage of the depreciation laws.

This was/is largely the cause for the many team sales beginning in the 70's. (21 of the 30 teams have been sold at least once in the past 15 years... and all 30 teams have changed hands since 1970.) Before the 70's many teams had stayed within a single family for 40, 50, and 60 years... the Cubs had a Wrigley in ownership from 1916-1981 (65 years).)

Now, it appears that Congress has changed the rules back, allowing owners to depreciate the full value of their teams over a 15 year stretch again.

So what does this mean for the Cubs? Verdi seems to think that the franchise is worth an extra 5% more after the bill became law. However, there are some problems with his reasoning. First, depreciation is a non-cash accounting entry, meaning the only cash to result from a depreciation expense is the tax that doesn't need to be paid (called a tax shield). For most U.S. companies, this is 35% of the expense. However, this money is also stretched out over 6 or 16 years depending on pre-tax bill or post-tax bill depreciation method. (As is usual with the government, a 5 year depreciation occurs over 6 years... half a year in the first year, and half a year in the sixth year = .5 + 4 + .5 = 5... but over 6 years).

The other factor that must be taken into consideration is this: would you rather have a dollar today or tommorrow? In finance... and trust me anyone concerned about depreciating their $100+ million sports franchise is concerned with the finances... we must discount the value of the tax rebates the teams will be receiving.

Discounting cash flows is the reverse of finding out how much will be in your savings account in 1 year. Instead of saying... I put a dollar in today, and with 5% interest its worth a 1.05, its saying... I will have $1.05 next year, how much did I put in today?

Having established our facts, we now ask: So what does this tax bill do for a prospective purchaser of the team? Well, the club's value has grown at a 12.2% annual rate since the Tribune Company bought the team in 1981 for $20.5 million. (Forbes has the team valued at $276 million). Thus, this 12.2% becomes our 'discount rate.' We also know that the Cubs 2004 payroll was approximately $90,560,000 (so says USA Today's salary database). Which would allow an owner who purchased the team before the tax law change to write off these expenses at a tax savings of approximately 35%.

Thus, before the tax law changed, a new owner would have received a current value $26 million in tax breaks.

Now that the tax law has changed, and assuming the club sold for $276 million, the new owner would be able to claim $50 million in present value tax breaks.

The difference between the two values is $24 million, or 8.7% of the franchise value.

But what does this mean for the Trib company... and more importantly for Cubs fans hoping for a higher player payroll? Nothing. The Trib Co. would have to sell the team to get the added value out of the team. The tax law change will have no impact on the team (except via the Expos... see below), and thus we shouldn't expect to see a significant change in player payroll due to the new tax rules... but there is now a better incentive for the Trib to sell... I've got $100 that I could chip in to Steve Stone's ownership group! ... Fat Chance.

So, who will benefit the most from the changes in the tax law? Not suprisingly Major Leage Baseball's very own franchise, the Expos! (Wow, you mean Bud Selig finally gives Washington D.C. its own baseball team, and Congress changes the tax law increasing the resale value of all MLB teams by about 5%! Amazing! Who'da thunk it?)

The reason the Expos will benefit most from this change in tax laws is that they will be sold this winter to the highest bidder... who just got a gigantic tax break from the Federal Government... and will be expected to pass most of that along to Montreal Expos L.P.

Excerpt from: Montreal Expos Owner Review
by: Byron Clarke, thecubdom.com May 26, 2004

The Montreal Expos are owned by a limited partnership, Montreal Expos L.P., which is in turn owned (I assume equally) by the other twenty nine major league baseball clubs. Further complicating the situation, limited partnerships must have a general partner which is responsible for managing the (limited) partnership.

This general partnership is named Montreal Expos GP, Inc. This is a shell corporation which allows the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball to run the team. Thus, in short, all twenty nine Major League Teams own the Montreal Expos, but the team is controlled by the office of the Commissioner of Baseball (OCB). (However, the OCB of course was set up and controlled by MLB owners.)

So how much will this mean for MLB? Well, the Expos franchise value has grown about 2.89% annually since 1991 (this is a horrible rate of return), but we are going to assume at least semi-competent management... thus I'll bump the discount rate up to a nice (arbitrary) 5%. Also, if Forbes is to be trusted, the Expos are a $145 M franchise before moving to Washington, and the new location should be worth at least $35 M to MLB (thus I will assign a pre-tax change value of $180 M to the franchise).

These assumptions lead to an additional present value of $33 million for MLB. (The tax change present value has an inverse relationship with the discount rate... and the 5% is probably low-balling it, so I also computed the savings with a discount rate of 10%, and that reduces the value by $11 million to $23 million.)

The long and the short of it? I believe the Washington Franchise will sell for about $205 - $225 million dollars. This will be an increase of about $100 million for MLB owners (who bought the team in 2002 from Jeffrey Loria for $120 M.) Each owner should pocket about $3.5 million as a result.

So, what happens when you give 29 owners an extra $3.5 million a piece? The small market clubs pocket the cash (yes Tampa Bay... I'm calling you out) and the large market teams drive up the free agent market (do you really think King George will pocket $3.5 M rather than trying to buy another title?)

Finally, throw in the $2 million per team for the XM Satellite Radio deal, and I think we can all see the free agent market gravitating back towards where it was in 2000.

Being quite capable of doing the math... super-agent Scott Boras has sensed the market pendulum swinging... and now wants a 10 year deal for Carlos (Dracula) Beltran.

Derek Smart at the Big Red C has done a phenomenal job documenting the Beltran saga... I point you there.
The Legend of Dracula
Beltran Sweepstakes - AL West
Beltran Sweepstakes - AL Central
Beltran Sweepstakes - AL East
Beltran Sweepstakes - NL West
Beltran Sweepstakes - NL East
Beltran Sweepstakes - NL Central

Posted by Byron at November 5, 2004 10:53 AM | Bookmark and Share | BallHype: hype it up!
Subscribe to The Cubdom - get emails with the latest Cubs info and pictures

This post has been tagged:



Very nice job, I did not know they do sucha good job of teaching tax in a finance program or are you working on an MST. Anyway, I think Verdi's facts are correct I just don't agree with his conclusion that every MLB teams value just went up by 5% which is also a point made by one of the comments which you do a masterful job of explaining.

The teams that will get an immediate tax benefit are teams that have a high inside basis, in other words teams who were purchased/sold recently i.e. Washington, and Boston Red Sox. The Cubs do not benefit is severly limited and in no way increases thier value by 5% as Verdi points out. However, as you allude it will make the purchase of a team in a good market like the Cubs much more attractive for new ownwership groups. Keep in mind the writeoff of their basis will be prospective since these changes will not allow to carryback a loss (too complicated to explain).

Finally, what does 6 million get you these days inthe FA market a washed up reliever or a washed up shortstop. SIx million is chump change for the spenders.

Thanks for the nice remarks... I know my taxes because I am a double major in Finance & Accounting... and am currently taking a tax class.

The point about the $6 million is that since all teams are getting it, it is inflationary. Thats one of the reasons $6 million only gets you a middling shortstop nowadays... the more money going into the system... with the number of players being held constant is causing inflation among player salaries... and we've seen pretty good evidence of that so far this winter. Omar Vizquel 3 years 12.25 million??? Troy Percival 2 years $12 million? those numbers weren't even being broached last year.

AddThis Feed Button

Get The Cubdom email updates



eXTReMe Tracker
Since Mar 18, 2004

Recent Entries

Monthly Archives

Cubs Sale Articles

© 2004 – 2015 Byron Clarke
legal - about thecubdom.com - site index